[PATCH] x86/Intel: fix indirect far jmp/call with operand size specified

[H.J. Lu]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> >> Distilled version (from memory):
>  >>
>  >>      .intel_syntax noprefix
>  >>      .code16
>  >> start:
>  >>      call    word ptr [bx]
>  >>      call    dword ptr [bx]
>  >>      call    fword ptr [bx]
>  >>      jmp     word ptr [bx]
>  >>      jmp     dword ptr [bx]
>  >>      jmp     fword ptr [bx]
>  >>
>  >
>  >It works with the current binutils.
>
>  Of course, since I committed the fix (being an Intel syntax thing, I didn't
>  need your approval).
>

That is exactly why I'd like to see testcases. I will see what I can do.


H.J.