[PATCH] x86/Intel: fix indirect far jmp/call with operand size specified
Andreas Jaeger
aj@suse.de
Thu Feb 21 16:49:00 GMT 2008
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Do you have testcases?
netboot fails with:
runtime.S86: Assembler messages:
runtime.S86:388: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `jmp'
runtime.S86:393: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `jmp'
runtime.S86:398: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `jmp'
Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: runtime.S86
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20080221/c478b150/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
--
Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, aj@suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg)
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 193 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20080221/c478b150/attachment.sig>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list