COMMITTED: Add support for STT_IFUNC

[Tristan Gingold]

On Dec 3, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:

> Hi Guys,

[...]

>    STT_IFUNC
>
>      This symbol type is the same as STT_IFUNC except that it always
                                        *********
Humm, interesting typo that makes the specification wrong!

Tristan.