Missing hunk in MIPS16 PIC support
Thiemo Seufer
ths@networkno.de
Sun Aug 17 15:18:00 GMT 2008
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I'd missed a hunk when porting the MIPS16 PIC patch to mainline.
> We were supposed to move stub information for indirect symbols
> to the target function.
>
> I only noticed this week, when running tests for the non-PIC gcc patch.
> As penance, I've added a binutils test to make this more visible.
>
> Tested on mips64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
>
> Richard
>
>
> bfd/
> * elfxx-mips.c (_bfd_mips_elf_copy_indirect_symbol): Copy MIPS16
> stub information.
>
> ld/testsuite/
> * ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4a.s, ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4b.s,
> ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4.ver, ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4a.dd,
> ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4a.nd, ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4a.gd,
> ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4c.s, ld-mips-elf/mips16-pic-4b.dd: New tests.
> * ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp: Run them.
Ok.
Thiemo
More information about the Binutils
mailing list