[PATCH][SH] Ensure that offset alignments are valid

Andrew STUBBS andrew.stubbs@st.com
Tue Apr 15 13:54:00 GMT 2008

Kaz Kojima wrote:
>> I never saw this problem before because the compiler does not (usually?) 
>> produce PC-relative code with far destinations, and anyway relaxation is 
>> broken elsewhere, I think.
> I agree with you.  It would not be worth to effort to fix this
> for the relax case at this time.

Well, I don't really want to introduce a regression - as far as I know 
this aspect of relaxation isn't broken.

I think I have figured out (a way) how to fix the problem - do the new 
offset checks if and only if neither of the symbols present in the fix 
data are undefined. If this is not that case the code behaves exactly as 

The attached patch includes this fix, and also has all the necessary 
updates the testsuite. It now passes the testsuite with exactly the same 
results as before, plus four new passes from the new test case I added.

I'm not certain that this is the best possible fix - I'm not really sure 
how the fixups are used. I suspect there may be some cases where the 
test would be applicable, but the prerequisite condition is not met (not 
that I have any evidence for that).

I have a real-world build test running at the moment. Assuming that 
doesn't find anything, is this OK?

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: unaligned-mova.patch
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20080415/12461877/attachment.ksh>

More information about the Binutils mailing list