[PATCH] decoded output of .debug_line from readelf -wL
Wed Apr 9 09:51:00 GMT 2008
Hi again Nick.
I finally sat down to implement your proposals:
> *) Please use xmalloc() rather than malloc(). That way you also do
> not need to check for a NULL return pointer.
Done. I wasn't aware of xmalloc().
> *) Please read the GNU Coding Standard:
Done. It would have been nice if
> *) The -wL and -wl command line options ought to display different
> comments at the start of their output, and if both switches are
> used then both comments should be displayed. eg:
> *) The new command line option needs to be documented in
> binutils/binutils.texi and mentioned in binutils/NEWS.
> *) It would be nice to have an option to suppress the output of the
> column number, as this can be rather confusing. It would be
> especially nice if this was done automatically if the column is
> always zero, unless the user has used a command line option to
> specifically request column numbers.
I just removed the column number from the output as gcc doesn't seem
to support it yet anyway.
> *) It would be nice if there were headings at the start of the
> decoded information for each compilation unit, and if you used a
> little more white space. eg:
> You might also want to restrict the number of characters printed
> for the file name unless the --wide command line option has been
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 21977 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Binutils