Loongson-2E and -2F support for binutils

[Mark Shinwell]

Zhang Le wrote:
> Since now you have come up with a better patch, we'd better
> stick with yours.

Eric approved the two patches last night, so I'll apply them today.

> However I have one question though. In include/elf/mips.h:
> +#define E_MIPS_MACH_LS2E        0x00A00000
> +#define E_MIPS_MACH_LS2F        0x00A10000
> How about we define them as 0x00B00000 and 0x00B10000 respectively. Maybe
> there will be loongson 1 coming in the future, so leave 0x00A00000 for them.

I'd rather leave these as they are for various reasons; I don't think
there's really an issue even if a Loongson 1 does appear in the future.

> Thanks again for your work!

No problem.

Mark