[patch] Re: binutils version of snapshot builds

[Matthias Klose]

Joseph S. Myers schrieb:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Unrelated to your patch: Building the snapshot using an earlier snapshot having
>> the same sonames for the shared libraries fails with an as segfault for the
>> first file in opcodes. This could be avoided including the date string in the
>> soversion (bfd/configure.in). Are there reasons against this configuration
>> (besides ending up with a version string "2.17.50.20070321.20070321")?
> 
> I think having 2.17.50.20070321 in the SONAME is reasonable.

changed in the attached patch. the version string doesn't duplicate the date.
checked with a snapshot and a release build.

  Matthias

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: binutils-soversion.diff
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20070322/378fd254/attachment.ksh>