[PATCH] Support VMX128 Instruction for PowerPC
Sebastian Biallas
sb@biallas.net
Thu Mar 15 14:49:00 GMT 2007
Nick Clifton schrieb:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>> Nope, I don't have access to the official documentation and I guess you
>> have to sign an NDA or something to get it.
>
> This worries me. If the designers of the VMX128 instruction set have
> not publicly released their ISA then using unofficial information in
> this way may be a breach of their copyright.
I don't think an ISA is protected by copyright. Maybe you can patent it,
but then you have to disclose it.
> Also - do you have a binutils copyright assignment on file with the FSF?
Not yet.
> Without such an assignment we could not consider accepting your patch.
Well, my patch contains virtually no code, so I thought it isn't worth
the legal stuff. But if it's needed, I'll get the assignment.
>> Should there an option like "-mxenon" which resembles the xenon cpu or
>> should there be a modifier like "-mvmx128" which selectively actives the
>> VMX128 instruction set?
>
> Go with "-mvmx128". That is the name of the ISA extension. There may
> well be other CPUs in the future which support this extension, so using
> "-mxenon" might become obsolete one day.
I'm still a little bit unsure here: The disassembler has no -maltivec
option, it will disassemble AltiVec instructions by default ("For
convenience"). So, should it also disassemble VMX128 instructions by
default?
More information about the Binutils
mailing list