PATCH: Adjust segment memory size for the SHT_NOBITS section

[H. J. Lu]

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:38:18PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 01:32:12PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Then of course you'd have to wonder why the code wasn't written that
> > way in the first place.  Please do some digging to find out why.
> 
> I got curious and had a look myself.  It looks like my patch
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-09/msg00225.html is at
> fault here.  Previously, both SEC_LOAD and !SEC_LOAD sections
> adjusted p_memsz based on their lmas.  Following that adjustment,
> there was another based on vma.
> 

I will check in this testcase shortly.


H.J.
----
2007-03-06  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	PR ld/4144
	* ld-elf/nobits-1.d: New file.
	* ld-elf/nobits-1.s: Likewise.
	* ld-elf/nobits-1.t: Likewise.

--- ld/testsuite/ld-elf/nobits-1.d.nobits	2007-03-06 19:32:14.000000000 -0800
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-elf/nobits-1.d	2007-03-06 19:31:51.000000000 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+#ld: -Tnobits-1.t
+#readelf: -l --wide
+
+#...
+ Section to Segment mapping:
+  Segment Sections...
+   00     .foo .bar 
--- ld/testsuite/ld-elf/nobits-1.s.nobits	2007-03-06 19:32:20.000000000 -0800
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-elf/nobits-1.s	2007-03-06 18:58:03.000000000 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+	.globl _entry
+	.section .foo,"awx",%progbits
+_entry:
+	.byte 0
+	.section .bar,"ax",%nobits
+	.byte 0
--- ld/testsuite/ld-elf/nobits-1.t.nobits	2007-03-06 19:32:17.000000000 -0800
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-elf/nobits-1.t	2007-03-06 18:59:02.000000000 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+ENTRY(_entry)
+PHDRS
+{
+  data PT_LOAD;
+}
+SECTIONS
+{
+  . = 0x1000000;
+  .foo : { *(.foo) } :data
+  . = 0x2000000;
+  .bar : { *(.bar) } :data
+  /DISCARD/ : { *(*) }
+}