Fix strip when sections are not sorted

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 11:28:46AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I think we should use the lowest section address, rather than the
> first section encountered.  Is this patch OK?

Looks reasonable to me,

>  	      if (!first_section)
> -		first_section = section;
> +		first_section = lowest_section = section;
> +	      if (section->vma < lowest_section->vma)
> +		lowest_section = section;
>  	      section_count++;

except that I'd be inclined to use lma here rather than vma.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM