[PATCH] aout relocs

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Michael,

>> That's the only place where something needs to be done (the pointer must
>> still be valid even if the size is zero).
> 
> Alright -- that's enough to justify the patch, isn't it?

Certainly - please apply it.  Although you could simplify the second part of 
the patch by just checking to see if count is zero and returning, in the same 
way as you check reloc_size.  That way you do not need to check the return 
values of both allocs.

Cheers
   Nick