PATCH: remove libiberty/ternary.c et al

[Ben Elliston]

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 21:40 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:

> It's been sitting there for six years, and I'm not a fan of making new
> libiberty versions not backward compatible.  Are there any other
> reasons to remove it besides "it's there" ?

Only the burden of maintaining it.

There is only a backward compatibility problem if there is a client of
these routines and we have no reason to believe there is.

Ben