mn10300: clarify a diagnostic

[Eric Christopher]

>
> getting back to this...
>

Wow. I'd almost forgotten.

>
> I could only find one "common" case that happened, which is calling a
> function without specifying -fpic.  So I broke that one out, patch
> below.  I'm open to suggestions on the wording of these messages, but
> let's improve on "dangerous error".
>
> Index: elf-m10300.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf-m10300.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.77
> diff -p -U3 -r1.77 elf-m10300.c
> --- elf-m10300.c	17 Oct 2006 13:41:46 -0000	1.77
> +++ elf-m10300.c	26 Jan 2007 02:18:38 -0000
> @@ -1499,7 +1499,10 @@ mn10300_elf_relocate_section (output_bfd
>  	      goto common_error;
>
>  	    case bfd_reloc_dangerous:
> -	      msg = _("internal error: dangerous error");
> +	      if (r_type == R_MN10300_PCREL32)
> +		msg = _("error: inappropriate relocation type for shared library  
> (did you forget -fpic?)");
> +	      else
> +		msg = _("internal error: dangerous relocation type used in  
> shared library");

"Suspicious" maybe?

-eric