[patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd

Alan Modra amodra@bigpond.net.au
Sat Jan 20 05:24:00 GMT 2007


On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:40:46PM -0500, Dave Brolley wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:07:56PM -0500, Dave Brolley wrote:
> >>> + #define R_RELC          0xff            /* Complex relocation type 
> >>code (see ELFXX_R_TYPE()) */
> >>
> >>$ egrep 'RELOC.*(255|0xff)' include/elf/*.h
> >>include/elf/arm.h:  RELOC_NUMBER (R_ARM_RBASE,                  255)
> >>include/elf/ppc.h:  RELOC_NUMBER (R_PPC_TOC16,          255)
> >>include/elf/sh.h:  RELOC_NUMBER (R_SH_64_PCREL, 255)
> 
> If you're trying to tell me that 0xff|255 is not a good value then I can 
> change that as well.

Yes, that's exactly what I was (cryptically) saying.  Existing object
files for these targets may already be using 255.  The following
appear to be available according to my scan over include/elf/*.h: 142,
143, 152, 155, 156, 157, 159, 197, 198, 199, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206,
207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 225, 226.
Perhaps it might be better to define the reloc on a target by target
basis?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre



More information about the Binutils mailing list