[patch][rfc] Complex Relocations gas and bfd
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Sat Jan 20 05:24:00 GMT 2007
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:40:46PM -0500, Dave Brolley wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:07:56PM -0500, Dave Brolley wrote:
> >>> + #define R_RELC 0xff /* Complex relocation type
> >>code (see ELFXX_R_TYPE()) */
> >>
> >>$ egrep 'RELOC.*(255|0xff)' include/elf/*.h
> >>include/elf/arm.h: RELOC_NUMBER (R_ARM_RBASE, 255)
> >>include/elf/ppc.h: RELOC_NUMBER (R_PPC_TOC16, 255)
> >>include/elf/sh.h: RELOC_NUMBER (R_SH_64_PCREL, 255)
>
> If you're trying to tell me that 0xff|255 is not a good value then I can
> change that as well.
Yes, that's exactly what I was (cryptically) saying. Existing object
files for these targets may already be using 255. The following
appear to be available according to my scan over include/elf/*.h: 142,
143, 152, 155, 156, 157, 159, 197, 198, 199, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206,
207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 225, 226.
Perhaps it might be better to define the reloc on a target by target
basis?
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils
mailing list