The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.9 is released
S.Çağlar Onur
caglar@pardus.org.tr
Mon Jan 8 07:45:00 GMT 2007
07 Oca 2007 Paz 23:29 tarihinde, H. J. Lu şunları yazmıştı:
> I can't reproduce it with gcc 3.4.6 nor gcc 4.1.1 20061011 (Red Hat
> 4.1.1-30) plus binutils 2.17.50.0.9. Can you show me the output of
I managed to build glibc with new binutils, seems like our package has some
problems, but im not sure how its related, we have;
...
shelltools.export("LANGUAGE", "C")
shelltools.export("LANG", "C")
shelltools.export("LC_ALL", "C")
shelltools.export("LD_RUN_PATH", "")
autotools.configure(...)
...
just removing "shelltools.export("LD_RUN_PATH", "")" line solves issue for new
binutils but old ones still can compile with that line.
> # readelf -d elf/ld.so
>
> Mine has
zangetsu build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl # readelf -d elf/ld.so
Dynamic section at offset 0x1aef8 contains 21 entries:
Tag Type Name/Value
0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [ld-linux.so.2]
0x00000004 (HASH) 0xf4
0x6ffffef5 (GNU_HASH) 0x1b4
0x00000005 (STRTAB) 0x468
0x00000006 (SYMTAB) 0x298
0x0000000a (STRSZ) 404 (bytes)
0x0000000b (SYMENT) 16 (bytes)
0x00000003 (PLTGOT) 0x1bfc0
0x00000002 (PLTRELSZ) 40 (bytes)
0x00000014 (PLTREL) REL
0x00000017 (JMPREL) 0x760
0x00000011 (REL) 0x700
0x00000012 (RELSZ) 96 (bytes)
0x00000013 (RELENT) 8 (bytes)
0x6ffffffc (VERDEF) 0x638
0x6ffffffd (VERDEFNUM) 6
0x0000001e (FLAGS) BIND_NOW
0x6ffffffb (FLAGS_1) Flags: NOW
0x6ffffff0 (VERSYM) 0x5fc
0x6ffffffa (RELCOUNT) 11
0x00000000 (NULL) 0x0
So it seems my fault sorry for noise :(
Cheers
--
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20070108/070a8911/attachment.sig>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list