[PATCH] A 64-bit address does not imply 64-bit DWARF2 offsets.

[Nick Clifton]

Hi Carlos,

> 2007-02-21  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* dwarf2.c (_bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line): Assume 32-bit
> 	DWARF even with 64-bit addresses.
> 	(_bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line): Likewise.
> 

Approved - please apply.

Actually it might be a good idea to extend the new comment to explain 
why we assume 32-bit debug info on a 64-bit target.  eg:

   /* In the absence of the hints above, we assume 32-bit DWARF2
      offsets even for targets with 64-bit addresses, because:
        a) most of the time these targets will not have generated
           more than 2Gb of debug info and so will not need 64-bit
           offsets,
      and
        b) if they do use 64-bit offsets but they are not using
           the size hints that are tested for above then they are
           not conforming to the DWARF3 standard anyway.  */

Cheers
   Nick