better error messages
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Mon Aug 6 15:55:00 GMT 2007
Hi Nathan,
> This patch adds a new bfd_nonfatal_message function, which produces more
> informative messages naming the bfd and the section, where applicable.
I agree with Andreas's comment that the new function needs to have a comment
header describing its inputs. In addition why did you remove the
RETURN_NONFATAL macro ? It would be cleaner to leave in place and just change
its argument to be the bfd.
> in
> preference to bfd_nonfatal (which should be deprecated, IMHO).
I don't agree. I think that there is a place for the bfd_nonfatal function,
for situations where a bfd is not available or not applicable.
Cheers
Nick
More information about the Binutils
mailing list