another ill test?

[Alan Modra]

On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:05:41AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> 21.11.06 00:03 >>>
> >On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:38:01AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> I'd
> >> therefore like to move Foo into .data, and additionally relax warn2.d to
> >> not expect a specific section number.
> >
> >No, leaving Foo there helps us test that symbols defined in discarded
> >sections are handled properly.
> 
> So - just relax the expectation to no longer be a hard 1?

That would be OK.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre