another ill test?
Wed Nov 22 03:38:00 GMT 2006
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 10:05:41AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Alan Modra <email@example.com> 21.11.06 00:03 >>>
> >On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 10:38:01AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> I'd
> >> therefore like to move Foo into .data, and additionally relax warn2.d to
> >> not expect a specific section number.
> >No, leaving Foo there helps us test that symbols defined in discarded
> >sections are handled properly.
> So - just relax the expectation to no longer be a hard 1?
That would be OK.
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre
More information about the Binutils