[RFH] About dlltool --output-exp --add-indirect.
Wed Nov 1 00:38:00 GMT 2006
Danny Smith wrote:
>>Anyone has an idea how to generate the equivalent of
>>Also, does anyone use this option nowadays?
>>Oh, and --add-indirect docs on dlltool's manual has the
>>I could find on binutils.
>> Specifies that when dlltool is creating the
>>exports file it
>>should add a section which allows the exported functions
>> to be referenced without using the import library.
>>the hell that means!
>.exp files built with --add-indirect can be used to create mutually
>I haven't done that in many years. I usually just add an IMPORTS
>section to .def file to
>do the same thing. I'll see if I can put together a test example.
I don't really get how --add-indirect helps here, but that is probably
because I didn't look deep enough.
An example would be nice to have. If nothing else, it could serve to
update our docs.
I wonder if we are really MSFT compatible like the comments say. The
is suspect, don't you think?
More information about the Binutils