Test suite results for mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)

Thiemo Seufer ths@networkno.de
Fri May 19 21:22:00 GMT 2006


Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[snip]
> 		=== ld tests ===
> 
> Schedule of variations:
>     unix
> 
> FAIL: vers24a
> FAIL: vers24b
> FAIL: vers24c
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main)
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1
> FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3

The SIGILL-induced of those are apparently neither hardware nor
endianness dependent, I got the same pattern on two different
machine architectures with different endianness.


Thiemo



More information about the Binutils mailing list