[patch] Arguments of GTY

Masaki Muranaka monaka@monami-software.com
Sun May 7 14:49:00 GMT 2006


On 2006/05/07, at 5:41, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> It sounds like you are trying to mix and match the include/ headers
> from binutils with an older GCC source tree.  Is that right?

Yes.

> Don't do it.  GCC has its own copy of these headers and should be  
> built
> using its own copy.

Then, why does it still have GTY?

--
Masaki Muranaka
Monami software




More information about the Binutils mailing list