ld -m elf_i386 on x86 Solaris

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Thu Jun 29 05:50:00 GMT 2006


On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:42:56AM +0100, Michael Wetherell wrote:
> On Friday 23 Jun 2006 19:12, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I've put a suggested fix below, which uses
> > > targ_extra_libpath=elf_i386 instead of targ_extra_emuls=elf_i386:
> >
> > You're supposed to set both.  I've checked in a similar fix, thanks.
> 
> Ok, if that's the convention.

I think it is - everyone else seems to spell it that way.

> >                          targ_extra_emuls="elf_i386 elf_x86_64"
> > +                       targ_extra_libpath=$target_extra_emuls
> 
> You have a typo in the name though                ^^

:-(  Sorry!  I'm glad you noticed.

> I'm preparing a patch for the 64-bit issues, so I'll include a fix in 
> there.

Could you send it separately?  That way it can be reviewed and applied
independently of more complex changes.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Binutils mailing list