ld -m elf_i386 on x86 Solaris
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Thu Jun 29 05:50:00 GMT 2006
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:42:56AM +0100, Michael Wetherell wrote:
> On Friday 23 Jun 2006 19:12, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > I've put a suggested fix below, which uses
> > > targ_extra_libpath=elf_i386 instead of targ_extra_emuls=elf_i386:
> >
> > You're supposed to set both. Â I've checked in a similar fix, thanks.
>
> Ok, if that's the convention.
I think it is - everyone else seems to spell it that way.
> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â targ_extra_emuls="elf_i386 elf_x86_64"
> > +Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â targ_extra_libpath=$target_extra_emuls
>
> You have a typo in the name though ^^
:-( Sorry! I'm glad you noticed.
> I'm preparing a patch for the 64-bit issues, so I'll include a fix in
> there.
Could you send it separately? That way it can be reviewed and applied
independently of more complex changes.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
More information about the Binutils
mailing list