PATCH: Move operand/address-size override prefixes before SIMD prefix

[malc]

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Menezes, Evandro wrote:

>> Thank you, but it does not. Because presence of both 0xf2 and 0xf3 in
>> the byte stream is not covered by this paragraph (perhaps the
>> situation is explained elsewhere in the manual?)
>
> Yes, elsewhere: "The result of using multiple prefixes from a single 
> group is unpredictable." (in "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual 
> Volume 3: General-Purpose and System Instructions", rev. 3.12, p. 3)
>
> HTH

This does. Thank you both Evandro Menezes and H.J Lu.

--
vale