PATCH: Move operand/address-size override prefixes before SIMD prefix

[malc]

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Dave Korn wrote:

> On 07 December 2006 11:50, malc wrote:
>
>
>> So your position is that it's #UD. Objdump disagrees with you, whether
>> rightfully or not is an open question (or original question if you will)
>
>
>  Well, can't you just try single-stepping over one in the debugger and see if
> it executes something or blows up with an illegal instruction trap?

I can. This will proove exactly nothing though. I want an official
position of Intel and AMD, even if the position is that the behaviour
is unspecified that will suit me just fine.

--
vale