[PATCH] typo in documentation for ld --check-sections

[Bernhard Fischer]

[Please keep me CC'ed]
Hi,

I think the word "any" is missing in this phrase:
"if there any overlaps"

Please apply,
Bernhard

2006-04-07  Bernhard Fischer  <aldot@gcc.gnu.org>

	* ld.texinfo: Fix typo in documentation of --check-sections.

-------------- next part --------------
diff -rup naked-ld.orig/ld.texinfo naked-ld/ld.texinfo
--- naked-ld.orig/ld.texinfo	2006-04-06 19:54:13.000000000 +0200
+++ naked-ld/ld.texinfo	2006-04-07 14:18:04.000000000 +0200
@@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ platforms which support shared libraries
 @item --check-sections
 @itemx --no-check-sections
 Asks the linker @emph{not} to check section addresses after they have
-been assigned to see if there any overlaps.  Normally the linker will
+been assigned to see if there are any overlaps.  Normally the linker will
 perform this check, and if it finds any overlaps it will produce
 suitable error messages.  The linker does know about, and does make
 allowances for sections in overlays.  The default behaviour can be