[patch] Arm FPA stfpls

[Richard Earnshaw]

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:21, Paul Brook wrote:
> > As we discussed last night, I think we should leave all obsolete insns
> > as-is.  So *all* FPA insns should remain infix only.  As should teqp,
> > tstp, cmpp & cmnp.
> >
> > This implies, for example, that cmppls is a legacy cmppl insn with infix
> > notation, not cmpp with postfix LS condition.
> 
> The attached patch implements this.
> 
> Tested with cross to arm-none-eabi.
> Ok?

Fine, thanks.

R.