DT_NEEDED entries for libraries not on the command line.
Kurt Roeckx
kurt@roeckx.be
Sun Sep 18 19:34:00 GMT 2005
Hi,
I'm trying to understand why a library can up in the DT_NEEDED
list while it was it was not on the command line, but it
is (indirectly) in the DT_NEEDED of a lib I'm linking too.
I've been reading the source, and saw the following comment:
/* A symbol from a library loaded via DT_NEEDED of some
other library is referenced by a regular object.
Add a DT_NEEDED entry for it. */
Or:
/* If this dynamic lib was specified on the command line with
--as-needed in effect, then we don't want to add a DT_NEEDED
tag unless the lib is actually used. Similary for libs brought
in by another lib's DT_NEEDED. */
So I'm guessing this is expected behaviour. This does not
seem to be happening in all cases, so I have to wonder
why it is happening.
Under what conditions does it add a DT_NEEDED from the
DT_NEEDED of an other lib? Would things break if it
didn't do that? Maybe a short example can help me
understand this?
PS: Please CC me, I'm not on the list.
Kurt
More information about the Binutils
mailing list