Change in .ld syntax or a bug?

[Alan Modra]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:17:08PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> It looks like ld is happy with sections which explicit set there
> address, eg .vectors and .data, but sections which just follow on from
> the previous section it is not happy with and seems to put them
> outside of memory.
> 
> Has there recently been a change in syntax? Or is this a bug?

A bug, I suspect.  Do you have anything in .vectors?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre