MIPS: Tweak support for linking without a GOT

[Eric Christopher]

On Nov 29, 2005, at 7:59 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> This is a pretty minor change for mainline, but a bit more  
> significant for
> the older branch where I encountered it (where it leads to a  
> segfault rather
> than potentially wrong output).  _bfd_mips_elf_hide_symbol is  
> called before
> we know whether we will need a GOT or not.  Therefore, it must pass
> maybe_excluded == TRUE to mips_elf_got_section, or it might not see  
> a GOT
> section if we haven't seen any definitely GOT relocations yet.
>
> Is this OK?

Sounds reasonable. OK.

-eric