[PATCH] x86: suppress emission of zero displacements in memoryoperands
Dave Korn
dave.korn@artimi.com
Fri May 6 14:00:00 GMT 2005
----Original Message----
>From: Jan Beulich
>Sent: 06 May 2005 13:04
> When explicitly specified, gas encoded a pointless zero displacement in
> memory addressing forms. Since this is not normally desired and was most
> likely just an oversight, this patch adds an adjustment to eliminate the
> displacement in that case.
I'm not sure if I've fully understood the intent of this patch, but I
think you're saying that if someone writes
mov %eax,0(%edi)
the assembler will emit
4 0003 8907 mov %eax,(%edi)
and not
2 0000 894700 mov %eax,0(%edi)
yes? Nothing the user _explicitly_ specifies should ever be discarded IMO.
What if someone wants to write self-modifying code that stores varying
offsets into that field?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
More information about the Binutils
mailing list