Another HP-UX IA64 Build patch

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:14:37AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Here is the second of my IA64 HP-UX build patches.  This one involves
> the declaration of basename() in include/libiberty.h.  What do people
> think about using the prototype version whenever we are compiling with
> GCC?
> 
> I did that rather than checking for HP-UX because some HP-UX systems
> (old PA ones) cannot handle the prototype but it seems like GCC should
> always be able to deal with it and it is when using GCC that "-Wall
> -Werror" will be set so I thought it might be better to check for GCC
> rather than HP-UX.  Does this seem reasonable to people?  Maybe we could
> remove some of the OS checks if we checked for GCC instead.
> 
> Tested on IA64 HP-UX.

This is wrong.  If your system headers have a conflicting prototype,
you will lose, regardless of what compiler you're using.

Do you really not have a prototype for basename?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC