[PATCH] Fix type and alignment of ARM/Thumb EABI mapping symbols
Richard Earnshaw
rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Mar 31 00:58:00 GMT 2005
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:34, Julian Brown wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:31, Julian Brown wrote:
> >
> >
> >> * bfd/cpu-arm.c (bfd_elf32_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name): ...to here,
> >> renamed and made global.
> >
> >
> > This function isn't elf specific, which is one of the reasons I
> > suggested moving it to cpu-arm.c. So why have you put elf32 in the
> > name?
>
> Doh, sorry. I was confused by the mapping symbols being defined by the
> AAELF spec, and didn't realise they would be used elsewhere too.
>
True, but we don't define a coff spec. However, I suspect that if we
did, we'd probably put mapping symbols in there too.
> Is the original name best, or would bfd_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name be
> better?
>
bfd_is_arm_mapping_symbol_name is fine.
R.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list