build failure for ia64 (due to -Werror)
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Sun Mar 20 19:42:00 GMT 2005
Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net> writes:
>> Andreas Schwab writes:
>>> James E Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com> writes:
>>>> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 17:23, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>> IMHO the only change we need is to check for BFD_HOST_64_BIT and error
>>>> out if that is not defined.
>>>
>>> Doesn't that break --enable-targets=all on a 32-bit host without long
>>> long?
>>
>> Yes, that is true. Although they are becoming rarer nowadays, and whether
>> it is worth to support this combination is another question.
>
> - Just to double check; 32-bit limited hosts would still be able to
> build/support correspondingly limited targets, yes?
Yes, sure. I'm not aware of anonther 32-bit backend that needs 64-bit
integers.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, MaxfeldstraÃe 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Binutils
mailing list