build failure for ia64 (due to -Werror)
James E Wilson
wilson@specifixinc.com
Sat Mar 19 12:13:00 GMT 2005
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 17:23, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> James E Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com> writes
> > You missed the point. First of all, there is no bfd_uint64_t type when
> > there is no 64-bit BFD.
> This is wrong. bfd_uint64_t does not require a 64-bit BFD, only a native
> 64-bit type (be it long long or long).
I can't argue this, as I've already said I don't understand fully how
this stuff works. I can only point to Alan's comments which insist that
there are other problems here.
I am trying to figure out how this stuff works, but you need to give me
some time, and meanwhile, please don't make any rash changes to the
IA-64 port.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com
More information about the Binutils
mailing list