XCOFF 64 function address wrong?
David Lecomber
david@allinea.com
Thu Mar 10 21:56:00 GMT 2005
> Would you like to try the attached, untested patch ? It is at best a
> workaround since all it really does is to try to make sure that if a
> symbol has a 64-bit value then it is displayed as such, but at least
> this is better than displaying a truncated version.
>
This fixes partially the problem -- the .main is properly addressed --
but the line numbering list remains truncated -- this being the
1 : 0x43c bit:
[ 89](sec 1)(fl 0x00)(ty 20)(scl 2) (nx 2) 0x0000000100000428 .main
AUX tagndx 0 ttlsiz 0x68 lnnos 2806 next 100
AUX indx 87 prmhsh 0 snhsh 0 typ 2 algn 0 clss 0 stb 0 snstb 0
.main :
1 : 0x43c
2 : 0x44c
Thanks
d.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list