gc sections and .eh_frame
Jonathan Larmour
jifl@eCosCentric.com
Fri Jun 10 11:49:00 GMT 2005
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>I'll be committing a gcc patch soon to fix this on all active gcc branches,
>>pre-approved by David Edelsohn.
>>
>> * config/rs6000/sysv4.h (TARGET_ASM_EXCEPTION_SECTION): Delete.
>
>
> Thanks for tracking this down!
Agreed, thanks! And hopefully that does mean it won't affect other
architectures after all.
But that still leaves us with a huge time gap between now, and when GCC
CVS after the patch finally reaches gcc 4.1.0.
So I would still be keen on pursuing a workaround in binutils, perhaps
along the lines of what I suggested (seeing if .gcc_except_table is in the
input sections), or anything else anyone thinks would work. Adding a
special case for powerpc probably wouldn't be wise as it wouldn't be
appropriate for gcc 4.1.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
More information about the Binutils
mailing list