gc sections and .eh_frame

[Eric Botcazou]

> So far, no-one has given any rationalisation for the change. It wasn't
> posted to this list, so there's no reason given there.

Huh... didn't you see the link I posted?  Here is it again:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00424.html

> To my eye, the change doesn't seem right - if a section is a dependency
> of .eh_frame, it needs to be kept. Needing to forcibly KEEP()
> all .gcc_except_table sections should not have been necessary in the first
> place. 

Please read the rationale I had given for the change.

-- 
Eric Botcazou