[RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
H. J. Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Wed Jul 13 00:47:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:41AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 02:26:43PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > * elf-bfd.h (elf_link_hash_entry): Add the provide field.
>
> No, you can do without this. Please think about the problem a little
> before throwing a patch together. I believe the right solution would be
> to provide section relative init/fini syms before size_dynamic_sections,
> if ref_regular_nonweak && !def_regular.
>
The final values have to be absulte. How does it support relaxation
when it will be called more then once?
H.J.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list