Q: Estimated date for 2.16 release ?
Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com
Thu Jan 27 14:26:00 GMT 2005
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 03:40:59PM +0200, Tomer Levi wrote:
>
>>Hi Nick,
>>
>>Is there any estimated date for the next Binutils formal release (version
>>2.16) ?
>>We would like to plan our work accordingly.
>
>
> There is no plan yet. I would like to branch sometime very soon; does
> anyone know of issues that need to be resolved before the next release?
With gcc 4.x coming, we have noticed that the problem Ralf
reported here happens on multiple targets. I don't know
if it was ever addressed or not.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-03/msg00489.html
Eric Norum (cc'ed) recently narrowed it down to this construct:
=============================================================
A little poking around reveals that it's the lines like:
_RamBase = DEFINED(_RamBase) ? _RamBase : 0x0;
_RamSize = DEFINED(_RamSize) ? _RamSize : 0x7f0000;
_HeapSize = DEFINED(_HeapSize) ? _HeapSize : 0; /* 0x20000;*/
_StackSize = DEFINED(_StackSize) ? _StackSize : 1M; /* 0x2000;*/
that are killing ld.
==============================================================
Does this sound familiar?
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the Binutils
mailing list