[RFA:] Trivial test for .gnu.warning.SYMBOL

[Eric Botcazou]

> Since you failed to include a target specification where the
> test failed, I had to assume that all such targets had the same
> behavior (e.g. program address map) and pick one and test.

You simply could have trusted me.

> In turn, I'll be more specific: "#notarget: sparc64-*-solaris*"
> But that's just a guess.

Thanks, works fine.  I initially went for "xfail", but I agree that "notarget" 
is better.


I commited this as obvious:

Index: warn1.d
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/warn1.d,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 warn1.d
--- warn1.d     7 Feb 2005 02:46:15 -0000       1.1
+++ warn1.d     13 Feb 2005 18:39:43 -0000
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 #ld:
 #warning: ^[^\\n]*\): warning: witty one-liner$
 #readelf: -s
+#notarget: "sparc64-*-solaris2*" "sparcv9-*-solaris2*"

 # Check that warnings are generated for the .gnu.warning.SYMBOL
 # construct and that the symbol still appears as expected.

-- 
Eric Botcazou