[RFA:] Trivial test for .gnu.warning.SYMBOL
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com
Sun Feb 6 14:33:00 GMT 2005
I noticed the lack of even trivial test-cases for ".gnu.warning".
Here's one for .gnu.warning.SYMBOL.
Ok to commit?
ld/testsuite:
* ld-elf/start.s, ld-elf/symbolref.s, ld-elf/symbol1w.s,
ld-elf/warn1.d: New test.
--- /dev/null Tue Oct 29 15:57:07 2002
+++ start.s Sat Feb 5 03:12:33 2005
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+ .text
+ .global _start
+_start:
+ .long 0
--- /dev/null Tue Oct 29 15:57:07 2002
+++ symbol1ref.s Sat Feb 5 03:12:49 2005
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+ .text
+ .long symbol1
+
--- /dev/null Tue Oct 29 15:57:07 2002
+++ symbol1w.s Sat Feb 5 03:32:12 2005
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+ .section .gnu.warning.symbol1
+ .asciz "witty one-liner"
+ .text
+ .global symbol1
+symbol1:
+ .long 0
--- /dev/null Tue Oct 29 15:57:07 2002
+++ warn1.d Sat Feb 5 05:06:00 2005
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+#source: start.s
+#source: symbol1ref.s
+#source: symbol1w.s
+#ld:
+#warning: ^[^\\n]*\): warning: witty one-liner$
+#readelf: -s
+
+# Check that warnings are generated for the .gnu.warning.SYMBOL
+# construct and that the symbol still appears as expected.
+
+#...
+[ ]+[0-9]+:[ ]+[0-9]+[ ]+0[ ]+NOTYPE[ ]+GLOBAL DEFAULT[ ]+[1-9] symbol1
+#pass
brgds, H-P
More information about the Binutils
mailing list