[RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64

Ian Lance Taylor ian@airs.com
Wed Apr 20 01:31:00 GMT 2005


Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com> writes:

> Mark Kettenis (mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl):
> 
> > Hmm.  Shouldn't we start using the standard AC_CHECK_DECL instead of
> > BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION?
> 
> I am certainly *not* the good person to answer this question ;-)
> It is quite easy to change from one to another, I would say. Why
> BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION was defined in the first place?

Because BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION was invented before AC_CHECK_DECL
existed.

Ian



More information about the Binutils mailing list