[PATCH] Sparc32 ELF TLS fixes
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Mon Apr 11 20:16:00 GMT 2005
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:46:45PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> While working on Sparc64 ELF TLS support, I found a bug in TLS
> handling on sparc32 ELF TLS.
>
> For relocations R_SPARC_TLS_*_{HIX22,LOX10} it clearly states at:
>
> http://docsun.cities.uiuc.edu/sun_docs/C/Solaris_9/SUNWdev/LLM/p60.html
>
> that the formula for R_SPARC_TLS_LDO_HIX22 is:
> @dtpoff(S + A) >> 10
> and for R_SPARC_TLS_LDO_LOX10 it is:
> @dtpoff(S + A) & 0x3ff
The relocation are then misnamed, but guess we have to live with that.
The values used in those relocations are never negative, so it makes sense.
> 2005-04-09 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> * elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_relocate_section,
> R_SPARC_TLS_LDO_{HIX22,LOX10}): When not shared, transition to
> R_SPARC_TLS_LE_{HIX22,LOX10}.
> (elf32_sparc_relocate_section, R_SPARC_TLS_{LDO,LE}_HIX22): Only
> xor relocation with 0xffffffff if R_SPARC_TLS_LE_HIX22.
> (elf32_sparc_relocate_section, R_SPARC_TLS_{LDO,LE}_LOX10): Only
> or 0x1c00 into relocation if R_SPARC_TLS_LE_HIX22.
Thanks, please commit.
I see
FAIL: S-records with constructors
failure both without and with this patch (SREC tests don't use TLS,
so that's not surprising).
> 2005-04-09 David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
> * ld-sparc/tlssunbin32.dd: Update for TLS relocation fixes.
> * ld-sparc/tlssunbin32.rd: Likewise.
> * ld-sparc/tlssunbin32.sd: Likewise.
You apparently missed also:
* ld-sparc/tlssunpic32.dd: Update for TLS relocation fixes.
--- ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunpic32.dd.jj 2004-07-01 12:24:18.000000000 -0400
+++ ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunpic32.dd 2005-04-11 16:00:07.470083241 -0400
@@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
+1168: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+116c: 40 00 44 02 call [0-9a-f]+ <__tls_get_addr@plt>
+1170: 01 00 00 00 nop *
- +1174: 27 3f ff ff sethi %hi\(0xfffffc00\), %l3
+ +1174: 27 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %l3
+1178: 01 00 00 00 nop *
- +117c: a8 1c fc 20 xor %l3, -992, %l4
+ +117c: a8 1c e0 20 xor %l3, 0x20, %l4
+1180: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+1184: aa 02 00 14 add %o0, %l4, %l5
+1188: 01 00 00 00 nop *
- +118c: 25 3f ff ff sethi %hi\(0xfffffc00\), %l2
+ +118c: 25 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %l2
+1190: 01 00 00 00 nop *
- +1194: a6 1c bc 26 xor %l2, -986, %l3
+ +1194: a6 1c a0 26 xor %l2, 0x26, %l3
+1198: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+119c: ec 12 00 13 lduh \[ %o0 \+ %l3 \], %l6
+11a0: 01 00 00 00 nop *
@@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
+11a8: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+11ac: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+11b0: 13 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %o1
- +11b4: 27 3f ff ff sethi %hi\(0xfffffc00\), %l3
+ +11b4: 27 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %l3
+11b8: 94 02 60 14 add %o1, 0x14, %o2
- +11bc: 25 3f ff ff sethi %hi\(0xfffffc00\), %l2
+ +11bc: 25 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %l2
+11c0: 90 05 c0 0a add %l7, %o2, %o0
- +11c4: a8 1c fc 40 xor %l3, -960, %l4
+ +11c4: a8 1c e0 40 xor %l3, 0x40, %l4
+11c8: 40 00 43 eb call [0-9a-f]+ <__tls_get_addr@plt>
- +11cc: a6 1c bc 45 xor %l2, -955, %l3
+ +11cc: a6 1c a0 45 xor %l2, 0x45, %l3
+11d0: aa 02 00 14 add %o0, %l4, %l5
+11d4: ec 0a 00 13 ldub \[ %o0 \+ %l3 \], %l6
+11d8: 01 00 00 00 nop *
@@ -135,13 +135,13 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
+11e0: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+11e4: 01 00 00 00 nop *
+11e8: 13 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %o1
- +11ec: 27 3f ff ff sethi %hi\(0xfffffc00\), %l3
+ +11ec: 27 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %l3
+11f0: 94 02 60 14 add %o1, 0x14, %o2
- +11f4: 25 3f ff ff sethi %hi\(0xfffffc00\), %l2
+ +11f4: 25 00 00 00 sethi %hi\(0\), %l2
+11f8: 90 05 c0 0a add %l7, %o2, %o0
- +11fc: a8 1c fc 63 xor %l3, -925, %l4
+ +11fc: a8 1c e0 63 xor %l3, 0x63, %l4
+1200: 40 00 43 dd call [0-9a-f]+ <__tls_get_addr@plt>
- +1204: a6 1c bc 64 xor %l2, -924, %l3
+ +1204: a6 1c a0 64 xor %l2, 0x64, %l3
+1208: aa 02 00 14 add %o0, %l4, %l5
+120c: ec 02 00 13 ld \[ %o0 \+ %l3 \], %l6
+1210: 01 00 00 00 nop *
Jakub
More information about the Binutils
mailing list