PR/338 (assertion in bfd_link_add_undef in linker.c)

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:42:58AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Isn't the change implemented to fix this problem insufficient in that it
> does not cover the case where the symbol is already on the undefined
> chain, but also is the last one there?

Grr.  Yes, I'll fix it tomorrow if someone doesn't beat me to it.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre