[PATCH] some x86 instructions tagged with incorrect CPU type

[H. J. Lu]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 05:33:08PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> 16.11.04 20:40:30 >>>
> >The first problem is the patched assemebler failed "make check" for
> >x86-64. I got
> 
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:
> >Assembler messages:
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:3:
> Warning: `aaa' is not supported in 64-bit mode
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:3:
> Error: suffix or operands invalid for `aaa'
> >
> >instead of
> >
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:
> >Assembler messages:
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:3:
> Error: suffix or operands invalid for `aaa'
> >
> >I would prefer just
> >
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:
> >Assembler messages:
> >/net/gnu//export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-inval.s:3:
> Error: `aaa' is not supported in 64-bit mode
> 
> This is easily fixed, as below/attached. Built/tested on
> i686-pc-linux-gnu
> (this time also as cross assembler targeting
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu).
> Despite finding this more desirable, too, I didn't originally dare to
> make
> these errors because they weren't before.
> 

This is OK. Please apply.

Thanks.


H.J.