PATCH: Reduce size of SymbianOS DLLs

Richard Earnshaw rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Nov 2 15:21:00 GMT 2004


On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 15:17, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 03:04:07PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > Grr.  I hate the BFD.  In particular I hate the fact that there is much
> > code in header files, especially elf32-arm.h!  If only I had the time to
> > restructure it all...
> > 
> > I guess if you are happy with all this, then I am happy :-)
> 
> Well now that you mention it...  elf32-arm.h is a header so that it can
> be included by elfarm-nabi.c and elfarm-oabi.c.  I haven't seen
> indication of the "old, old" ABI being used in a long time.  If I
> remember right, you were talking about removing it.
> 
> If there's no reason not to do that, we could move all the code from
> elf32-arm.h and elfarm-nabi.c to elf32-arm.c (or just move it to
> elfarm-nabi.c to avoid disrupting history).  That's real simple.

I would have thought all the 'interesting' history was in elf32-arm.h,
which we'd loose anyway.  So moving it all to elf32-arm.c would probably
be the 'correct' move for consistency with other architectures.

Are we at the correct point in the release cycle for making this sort of
change?

R.



More information about the Binutils mailing list