On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 02:28, H. J. Lu wrote: > > The patch is not corrrect. I am testing this patch now. > Yes, I agree. But then why not define ar_is_in_integer_unit (int reg) as following now: static int ar_is_in_integer_unit (int reg) { reg -= REG_AR; return reg >= 48 && reg <= 127; } Jie