changing the default hash table size (was improving ld perfor mance)

[Andy Chittenden]

Nick

> ....  Andy - did you intend to 
> write some documentation for this section of the bfd manual ?

I can't remember - it was so long ago. It's strange that I didn't get an
error when I developed the original patch.

-- 
Andy, BlueArc Engineering 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Clifton [mailto:nickc@redhat.com]
> Sent: 24 May 2004 08:57
> To: Alexandre Oliva; Andy Chittenden
> Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: changing the default hash table size (was improving ld
> performance)
> 
> 
> Hi Alex, Hi Andy
> 
> >>Index: bfd/hash.c
> >>  @* Deriving a New Hash Table Type::
> >>+ @* Changing the default Hash Table Size::
> >>  @end menu
> > 
> > 
> > The added info section appears to be missing from the 
> patch.  I can't
> > generate the info files after this patch unless I take out the line
> > added above, but I don't think that's the right thing to do if there
> > was supposed to be more documentation about it.  Was there?
> 
> There was not :-(
> 
> I have removed this line from the sources.  Andy - did you intend to 
> write some documentation for this section of the bfd manual ?
> 
> Cheers
>    Nick
> 
> bfd/ChangeLog
> 2004-05-24  Nick Clifton  <nickc@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* hash.c: Remove bogus node "Changing the default Hash 
> Table Size"
> 	introduced by hash table size patch.
> 
> 
> 
>