[rfa] ARM .cfi_* support

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:05:00PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now.  It adds support
> > > > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > > > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > > > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > > > you need.
> > > > 
> > > > Tested on arm-elf.  OK?
> > > 
> > > Ping?
> > 
> > Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
> > holiday...)
> > 
> > I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
> > numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf).  I
> > would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
> > numbering schemes. 
> 
> In that case, would the patch be OK without the FPA registers?  I only
> have actual need for the core integer registers.

Ping?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz